Fix outdated comment about overflow (#112595)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -380,13 +380,13 @@ class CupertinoSliverRefreshControl extends StatefulWidget {
|
||||
) {
|
||||
final double percentageComplete = clampDouble(pulledExtent / refreshTriggerPullDistance, 0.0, 1.0);
|
||||
|
||||
// Place the indicator at the top of the sliver that opens up. Note that we're using
|
||||
// a Stack/Positioned widget because the CupertinoActivityIndicator does some internal
|
||||
// translations based on the current size (which grows as the user drags) that makes
|
||||
// Padding calculations difficult. Rather than be reliant on the internal implementation
|
||||
// of the activity indicator, the Positioned widget allows us to be explicit where the
|
||||
// widget gets placed. Also note that the indicator should appear over the top of the
|
||||
// dragged widget, hence the use of Overflow.visible.
|
||||
// Place the indicator at the top of the sliver that opens up. We're using a
|
||||
// Stack/Positioned widget because the CupertinoActivityIndicator does some
|
||||
// internal translations based on the current size (which grows as the user drags)
|
||||
// that makes Padding calculations difficult. Rather than be reliant on the
|
||||
// internal implementation of the activity indicator, the Positioned widget allows
|
||||
// us to be explicit where the widget gets placed. The indicator should appear
|
||||
// over the top of the dragged widget, hence the use of Clip.none.
|
||||
return Center(
|
||||
child: Stack(
|
||||
clipBehavior: Clip.none,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user