Reverts: flutter/flutter#146593
Initiated by: zanderso
Reason for reverting: Consistently failing `Windows_android native_assets_android` as in https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Windows_android%20native_assets_android/2533/overview
Original PR Author: bkonyi
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino, kenzieschmoll}
This change reverts the following previous change:
This change is a major step towards moving away from shipping DDS via Pub.
The first component of this PR is the move away from importing package:dds to launch DDS. Instead, DDS is launched out of process using the `dart development-service` command shipped with the Dart SDK. This makes Flutter's handling of DDS consistent with the standalone Dart VM.
The second component of this PR is the initial work to prepare for the removal of instances of DevTools being served manually by the flutter_tool, instead relying on DDS to serve DevTools. This will be consistent with how the standalone Dart VM serves DevTools, tying the DevTools lifecycle to a live DDS instance. This will allow for the removal of much of the logic needed to properly manage the lifecycle of the DevTools server in a future PR. Also, by serving DevTools from DDS, users will no longer need to forward a secondary port in remote workflows as DevTools will be available on the DDS port.
There's two remaining circumstances that will prevent us from removing DevtoolsRunner completely:
- The daemon's `devtools.serve` endpoint
- `flutter drive`'s `--profile-memory` flag used for recording memory profiles
This PR also includes some refactoring around `DebuggingOptions` to reduce the number of debugging related arguments being passed as parameters adjacent to a `DebuggingOptions` instance.
This change is a major step towards moving away from shipping DDS via
Pub.
The first component of this PR is the move away from importing
package:dds to launch DDS. Instead, DDS is launched out of process using
the `dart development-service` command shipped with the Dart SDK. This
makes Flutter's handling of DDS consistent with the standalone Dart VM.
The second component of this PR is the initial work to prepare for the
removal of instances of DevTools being served manually by the
flutter_tool, instead relying on DDS to serve DevTools. This will be
consistent with how the standalone Dart VM serves DevTools, tying the
DevTools lifecycle to a live DDS instance. This will allow for the
removal of much of the logic needed to properly manage the lifecycle of
the DevTools server in a future PR. Also, by serving DevTools from DDS,
users will no longer need to forward a secondary port in remote
workflows as DevTools will be available on the DDS port. This code is currently
commented out and will be enabled in a future PR.
There's two remaining circumstances that will prevent us from removing
DevtoolsRunner completely:
- The daemon's `devtools.serve` endpoint
- `flutter drive`'s `--profile-memory` flag used for recording memory
profiles
This PR also includes some refactoring around `DebuggingOptions` to
reduce the number of debugging related arguments being passed as
parameters adjacent to a `DebuggingOptions` instance.
The current URL has 2 /to, but it should only be 1. However, this url redirects to https://docs.flutter.dev/release/breaking-changes/android-java-gradle-migration-guide, so I can change it to that if it's preferred just to go to the final destination - just don't know if it's a redirect for a reason
i didn't create an issue as it's a doc change, but if that's a requirement I can do that
Reverts: flutter/flutter#150969
Initiated by: goderbauer
Reason for reverting: Failing test in https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8743574743030691569/+/u/run_android_obfuscate_test/stdout
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino, reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
After the land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53592, there is some log spam:
```
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/c1e137371ec1afe9bc9bd7b05823752d/transformed/fragment-1.7.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/fragment_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/d86c7cb1c556fe1655fa56db671c649c/transformed/jetified-activity-1.8.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/activity_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
...
```
I think this is harmless, but still annoying. Upgrading the AGP version fixes it. To be honest, I don't know why (I expected the Kotlin version would do it). But after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, our tests have been running on AGP/Gradle 8.1/8.3 for a while, so it makes sense to upgrade anyways.
In a follow up PR:
1. Also upgrade the tests that were left behind in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, as I think removal of discontinued plugins paved the way here.
After the land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53592, there is some log spam:
```
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/c1e137371ec1afe9bc9bd7b05823752d/transformed/fragment-1.7.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/fragment_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/d86c7cb1c556fe1655fa56db671c649c/transformed/jetified-activity-1.8.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/activity_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
...
```
I think this is harmless, but still annoying. Upgrading the AGP version fixes it. To be honest, I don't know why (I expected the Kotlin version would do it). But after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, our tests have been running on AGP/Gradle 8.1/8.3 for a while, so it makes sense to upgrade anyways.
In a follow up PR:
1. Also upgrade the tests that were left behind in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, as I think removal of discontinued plugins paved the way here.
Even though this does not fix the below issue lets land this anyway as not logging to stderr when clearing logs makes sense to me.
related https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/150093
The test added is bad. It does not verify the behavior changed.
To verify the behavior changed correctly I would need to modify the generic device class to have clearLogs be an async function like many of the other calls. That would mean modifying every other device type and their implementations and their tests. Then I would need to update android_device to expose its logger. That is more than I have time for to validate a 2% flake error.
Feel free to disagree in the comments on this pr.
Currently, the error message displayed to regenerate the lockfiles gives a Unix-like command ./gradlew, which will be incorrect for Windows environments. This PR uses globals.platform.isWindows to give the appropriate command.
closes#136763
This pull request aims for improved readability, based on issue #146600.
```dart
// before
List<SupportedPlatform> getSupportedPlatforms({bool includeRoot = false}) {
final List<SupportedPlatform> platforms = includeRoot
? <SupportedPlatform>[SupportedPlatform.root]
: <SupportedPlatform>[];
if (android.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.android);
}
if (ios.exists) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.ios);
}
if (web.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.web);
}
if (macos.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.macos);
}
if (linux.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.linux);
}
if (windows.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.windows);
}
if (fuchsia.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.fuchsia);
}
return platforms;
}
// after
List<SupportedPlatform> getSupportedPlatforms({bool includeRoot = false}) {
return <SupportedPlatform>[
if (includeRoot) SupportedPlatform.root,
if (android.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.android,
if (ios.exists) SupportedPlatform.ios,
if (web.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.web,
if (macos.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.macos,
if (linux.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.linux,
if (windows.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.windows,
if (fuchsia.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.fuchsia,
];
}
```
Convert `ProjectMigration.run()` and `ProjectMigrator.migrate()` to be async.
Needed for Swift Package Manager migration, which requires some async processes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146256
Also move the vm service discovery logic into platform-specific implementation of `Device`s. This is to avoid having platform-specific code in attach.dart.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144454
For reference, after formatting it looks like:
```
ââ Flutter Fix âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
â [!] Your project requires a newer version of the Kotlin Gradle plugin. â
â Find the latest version on https://kotlinlang.org/docs/releases.html#release-details, then update the â
â version number of the plugin with id "org.jetbrains.kotlin.android" in the plugins block of â
â /Users/mackall/development/BugTesting/ELIMINATEME/blah/android/settings.gradle. â
â â
â Alternatively (if your project was created before Flutter 3.19), update â
â /Users/mackall/development/BugTesting/ELIMINATEME/blah/android/build.gradle â
â ext.kotlin_version = '<latest-version>' â
ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
```
We should always target the newest, and 34 is the newest. This isn't a requirement yet (like it is for 33+) but presumably it will be made required in the nearish future.
This pull request fixes#143803 by taking advantage of Dart's null-aware operators.
And unlike `switch` expressions ([9 PRs](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/143634) and counting), the Flutter codebase is already fantastic when it comes to null-aware coding. After refactoring the entire repo, all the changes involving `?.` and `??` can fit into a single pull request.
This is a direct revert of (the revert of (the reland of (the policy pr))): https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/143132.
The only change is:
1. to put a conditional all on one line, because the packages repository has a test that uses an old flutter project to make sure nothing regresses. The old project uses an old gradle version, and the old gradle version bundles an old groovy version, and the old groovy version has a bug where lines that start with `&&` don't always work: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7218 (I enjoy that the revert reason ends up providing another strong justification to go forward with the policy). Also thanks to @reidbaker for pointing out this bug.
2. I also made a slight formatting change to the messages that print when out of the support bounds, which I think looks slightly better.
I tested this with on a branch that included a revert of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/142008, and was able to recreate the failure and verify that it was resolved by 1).
Re land of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/142000.
Differences:
1. Fixed the test that was failing in postsubmit. The reason was that the Flutter Gradle Plugin was being applied after KGP in that test, so we couldn't find the KGP version. This caused a log, and the test expects no logs. I moved FGP to after KGP
2. Added to the logs for when we can't find AGP. Change is from
> "Warning: unable to detect project AGP version. Skipping version checking."
to
> ~"Warning: unable to detect project AGP version. Skipping version checking. \nThis may be because you have applied the Flutter Gradle Plugin after AGP."~
update: the above is wrong, changed to
> "Warning: unable to detect project KGP version. Skipping version checking. \nThis may be because you have applied AGP after the Flutter Gradle Plugin."
3. Added a note to the app-level build.gradle templates that FGP must go last
> // The Flutter Gradle Plugin must be applied after the Android and Kotlin Gradle plugin.
Reland of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/142709.
The revert of the revert is in the first commit, the fix in the commit on top.
The move of the fakes for packages/flutter_tools/test/general.shard/resident_runner_test.dart was erroneous before, as it was trying to use setters instead of a private field. This PR changes the private `_devFS` field in the fake to be a public `fakeDevFS` in line with other fakes.
## Original PR description
Native assets in other build systems are not built with `package:native_assets_builder` invoking `build.dart` scripts. Instead all packages have their own blaze rules. Therefore we'd like to not depend on `package:native_assets_builder` from flutter tools in g3 at all.
This PR aims to move the imports of `native_assets_builder` and `native_assets_cli` into the `isolated/` directory and into the files with a `main` function that are not used in with other build systems.
In order to be able to remove all imports in files used by other build systems, two new interfaces are added `HotRunnerNativeAssetsBuilder` and `TestCompilerNativeAssetsBuilder`. New parameters are then piped all the way through from the entry points:
* bin/fuchsia_tester.dart
* lib/executable.dart
The build_system/targets dir is already excluded in other build systems.
So, after this PR only the two above files and build_system/targets import from `isolated/native_assets/` and only `isolated/native_assets/` import `package:native_assets_cli` and `package:native_assets_builder`.
Context:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142041
Policy per https://flutter.dev/go/android-dependency-versions.
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140913
~Still a WIP while I clean up some error handling, remove some prints, and figure out a Java test (more difficult than the others because I believe we can only install one java version per ci shard).~
~Also it looks like there are errors that I need to fix when this checking is applied to a project that uses the old way of applying AGP/KGP using the top-level `build.gradle` file (instead of the new template way of applying them in the `settings.gradle` file).~ Done, this is why [these lines exist](9af6bae6b9/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/groovy/flutter.groovy (L72-L88)) in `flutter.groovy`. They just needed to be added
Reverts flutter/flutter#142709
Initiated by: vashworth
Reason for reverting: `Mac tool_tests_general` started failing on this commit: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac%20tool_tests_general/15552/overview
Original PR Author: dcharkes
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino, chingjun, reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Native assets in other build systems are not built with `package:native_assets_builder` invoking `build.dart` scripts. Instead all packages have their own blaze rules. Therefore we'd like to not depend on `package:native_assets_builder` from flutter tools in g3 at all.
This PR aims to move the imports of `native_assets_builder` and `native_assets_cli` into the `isolated/` directory and into the files with a `main` function that are not used in with other build systems.
In order to be able to remove all imports in files used by other build systems, two new interfaces are added `HotRunnerNativeAssetsBuilder` and `TestCompilerNativeAssetsBuilder`. New parameters are then piped all the way through from the entry points:
* bin/fuchsia_tester.dart
* lib/executable.dart
The build_system/targets dir is already excluded in other build systems.
So, after this PR only the two above files and build_system/targets import from `isolated/native_assets/` and only `isolated/native_assets/` import `package:native_assets_cli` and `package:native_assets_builder`.
Context:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142041
Native assets in other build systems are not built with `package:native_assets_builder` invoking `build.dart` scripts. Instead all packages have their own blaze rules. Therefore we'd like to not depend on `package:native_assets_builder` from flutter tools in g3 at all.
This PR aims to move the imports of `native_assets_builder` and `native_assets_cli` into the `isolated/` directory and into the files with a `main` function that are not used in with other build systems.
In order to be able to remove all imports in files used by other build systems, two new interfaces are added `HotRunnerNativeAssetsBuilder` and `TestCompilerNativeAssetsBuilder`. New parameters are then piped all the way through from the entry points:
* bin/fuchsia_tester.dart
* lib/executable.dart
The build_system/targets dir is already excluded in other build systems.
So, after this PR only the two above files and build_system/targets import from `isolated/native_assets/` and only `isolated/native_assets/` import `package:native_assets_cli` and `package:native_assets_builder`.
Context:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142041
This PR increases Android's `minSdkVersion` to 21.
There are two changes in this PR aside from simply increasing the number
from 19 to 21 everywhere.
First, tests using `flutter_gallery` fail without updating the
lockfiles. The changes in the PR are the results of running
`dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart` on that app.
Second, from
[here](https://developer.android.com/build/multidex#mdex-pre-l):
> if your minSdkVersion is 21 or higher, multidex is enabled by default
and you don't need the multidex library.
As a result, the `multidex` option everywhere is obsolete. This PR
removes all logic and tests related to that option that I could find.
`Google testing` and `customer_tests` pass on this PR, so it seems like
this won't be too breaking if it is at all. If needed I'll give this
some time to bake in the framework before landing the flutter/engine
PRs.
Context: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/138117,
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/141277, b/319373605
It's now possible to natively compile a flutter app for windows-arm64. Cross-compilation is not yet implemented.
Uses arm64 artifacts now available for Dart/Flutter. Platform detection is based on Abi class, provided by Dart. Depending if Dart is an arm64 or x64 binary, the Abi is set accordingly. Initial bootstrap of dart artifacts (update_dart_sdk.ps1) is checking PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE environment variable, which is the way to detect host architecture on Windows.
This is available only for master channel (on other channels, it fallbacks to windows-x64).
On windows-x64, it produces an x64 app. On windows-arm64, it produces an arm64 app.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/141827
Reland: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/346960 has rolled into g3, so the imports should now resolve in g3 as well.
> [!CAUTION]
> _Do NOT merge if "Google Testing" bot didn't run!_
Rolls the packages from https://github.com/dart-lang/native in the native assets implementation.
Most notable we're refactoring `package:native_assets_cli` for `build.dart` use.
Therefore, all imports to that package for Flutter/Dart should be to the implementation internals that are no longer visible for `build.dart` writers. Hence all the import updates.
No behavior in Flutter apps should change.
This PR also updates the template to use the latests version of `package:native_assets_cli` which no longer exposes all the implementation details.
Reverts flutter/flutter#137618
Initiated by: Jasguerrero
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
It's now possible to natively compile a flutter app for
windows-arm64. Cross-compilation is not yet implemented.
Uses arm64 artifacts now available for Dart/Flutter.
Platform detection is based on Abi class, provided by Dart. Depending if
Dart is an arm64 or x64 binary, the Abi is set accordingly.
Initial bootstrap of dart artifacts (update_dart_sdk.ps1) is checking
PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE environment variable, which is the way to detect
host architecture on Windows.
This is available only for master channel (on other channels, it
fallbacks to windows-x64).
On windows-x64, it produces an x64 app. On windows-arm64, it produces an
arm64 app.
It's now possible to natively compile a flutter app for
windows-arm64. Cross-compilation is not yet implemented.
Uses arm64 artifacts now available for Dart/Flutter.
Platform detection is based on Abi class, provided by Dart. Depending if
Dart is an arm64 or x64 binary, the Abi is set accordingly.
Initial bootstrap of dart artifacts (update_dart_sdk.ps1) is checking
PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE environment variable, which is the way to detect
host architecture on Windows.
This is available only for master channel (on other channels, it
fallbacks to windows-x64).
On windows-x64, it produces an x64 app. On windows-arm64, it produces an
arm64 app.
Rolls the packages from https://github.com/dart-lang/native in the native assets implementation.
Most notable we're refactoring `package:native_assets_cli` for `build.dart` use.
Therefore, all imports to that package for Flutter/Dart should be to the implementation internals that are no longer visible for `build.dart` writers. Hence all the import updates.
No behavior in Flutter apps should change.
This PR also updates the template to use the latests version of `package:native_assets_cli` which no longer exposes all the implementation details.
I continued [my mission](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/141431) to find as many typos as I could. This time it's a smaller set than before.
There is no need for issues since it's a typo fix.
